Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
As we navigate the post-pandemic world, the query of methods to conduct effective video meetings has turn out to be a hot topic. One particular point of contention is whether or not to maintain cameras on or off during these meetings. As an authority in hybrid work models, I’ve had the privilege of helping quite a few organizations navigate this latest terrain. Recently, I had an enlightening conversation with Nick Bloom of Stanford University, who’s one in all the leaders of the WFH Research group and has conducted extensive research on this very topic.
Related: 5 Ways to Keep Engaged During Boring Virtual Meetings
The case for cameras on
Nick’s research — which surveyed 10,000 working Americans — revealed some surprising facts. Even in small meetings of 4 people or less, lower than half of the participants had their cameras on on a regular basis. This was a surprising revelation, considering the common assumption that smaller meetings would naturally encourage more camera usage.
The research also found that having cameras on during meetings significantly increases engagement. Half of the respondents reported feeling more engaged when their cameras were on, and they perceived others within the meeting as more engaged as well. This symmetry in perception is a powerful argument for the “cameras on” camp.
This finding is especially significant within the context of the hybrid work model. With employees working remotely, video meetings are sometimes the one opportunity for face-to-face interaction. The visual cues that include having cameras on — the nods of agreement, the puzzled frowns, the grins of understanding — can go a great distance in fostering a way of connection and collaboration.
The downside of constant visibility
Nevertheless, it isn’t all rosy on this planet of video meetings. I brought up a study within the Journal of Applied Psychology in 2021 that showed that having cameras on during meetings can result in increased fatigue. This can be a significant concern, as worker well-being is a vital consider productivity and overall job satisfaction.
Nick Bloom agreed with this finding, noting that being more engaged in a gathering, which is more likely when your camera is on, can indeed be more tiring. It’s akin to the difference between sitting through a math exam versus randomly ticking off answers. The former requires more mental energy and concentration, resulting in fatigue.
This raises a vital query: Is the increased engagement definitely worth the potential fatigue? The answer, as is commonly the case, will not be black and white. It depends on quite a lot of aspects, including the character of the meeting, the participants involved, and the general work culture of the organization.
Striking the precise balance
So, how can we reconcile the necessity for engagement with the potential for fatigue? The key lies to find the precise balance and setting appropriate norms. For smaller meetings, it’s advisable to encourage camera usage. Nevertheless, it is also crucial to avoid back-to-back meetings, which might exacerbate fatigue.
Institutions like Harvard and MIT have adopted a practice of leaving a 10-minute gap between classes to permit students to rest and recharge. This practice might be effectively applied to the company world as well, with meetings ending five minutes before the hour or half-hour to offer employees a likelihood to take a break.
This approach not only helps to mitigate fatigue but additionally allows employees time to process the knowledge from the meeting and prepare for the subsequent one. It’s an easy yet effective solution to enhance the productivity and effectiveness of video meetings.
The importance of meeting standards
The decision to show cameras on or off is also guided by the character and importance of the meeting. For instance, in a weekly standard meeting where everyone seems to be merely sharing reports, only the presenter might have to have their camera on. Nevertheless, for more collaborative meetings where observing body language and reactions is crucial, having cameras on can be helpful.
If a gathering is deemed non-critical, and participants can afford to pay half attention, perhaps that meeting must be reconsidered or converted right into a written format. This approach would save time and reduce unnecessary fatigue. It will also respect the time and energy of the participants, allowing them to focus on tasks that require their full attention.
In contrast, for meetings that require lively collaboration and discussion, having cameras on can significantly enhance the standard of the interaction. Having the ability to see one another’s expressions and reactions can foster a way of connection and mutual understanding that is tough to realize through voice alone.
Related: Why Meeting Culture is Draining your Worker’s Strength and Productivity
The final verdict
While having cameras on during video meetings can enhance engagement, it’s essential to be mindful of the potential for fatigue. By setting clear norms, allowing for breaks between meetings, and considering the character and importance of every meeting, we will optimize the usage of video meetings within the hybrid work model.
The world of labor is continually evolving, and as we adapt to those changes, it’s crucial to maintain the well-being and productivity of employees on the forefront. The debate of camera on or off is only one aspect of this larger conversation. As we proceed to explore and understand this latest terrain, let’s remember to maintain our focus on creating an environment that fosters engagement, productivity and overall job satisfaction.
Remember, the goal is not only to survive on this latest world of labor, but to thrive in it. So, the subsequent time you end up in a video meeting, consider the impact of that little camera icon. It isn’t nearly visibility, but about engagement, productivity, and well-being.
As we proceed to navigate the hybrid work model, let’s keep the conversation going. Let’s keep questioning, exploring and finding the perfect ways to work on this brave latest world. In spite of everything, the long run of labor is here, and it’s as much as us to shape it.
The debate over camera usage in video meetings is a microcosm of the broader challenges we face within the hybrid work model. It is a reminder that we’d like to repeatedly reassess and adapt our practices to make sure that they serve the well-being and productivity of our employees.
So, whether you select to show your camera on or off in your next video meeting, keep in mind that the final word goal is to create a piece environment that’s engaging, productive, and respectful of the well-being of all participants. And that may be a goal price striving for.