Klaus Vedfelt | Digitalvision | Getty Images
Cue the George Orwell reference.
Depending on where you’re employed, there’s a big likelihood that artificial intelligence is analyzing your messages on Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zoom and other popular apps.
Huge U.S. employers equivalent to Walmart, Delta Air Lines, T-Mobile, Chevron and Starbucks, in addition to European brands including Nestle and AstraZeneca, have turned to a seven-year-old startup, Aware, to monitor chatter amongst their rank and file, according to the corporate.
Jeff Schumann, co-founder and CEO of the Columbus, Ohio-based startup, says the AI helps corporations “understand the danger inside their communications,” getting a read on employee sentiment in real time, slightly than depending on an annual or twice-per-year survey.
Using the anonymized data in Aware’s analytics product, clients can see how employees of a certain age group or in a selected geography are responding to a latest corporate policy or marketing campaign, according to Schumann. Aware’s dozens of AI models, built to read text and process images, may also discover bullying, harassment, discrimination, noncompliance, pornography, nudity and other behaviors, he said.
Aware’s analytics tool — the one which monitors employee sentiment and toxicity — doesn’t have the flexibility to flag individual employee names, according to Schumann. But its separate eDiscovery tool can, within the event of utmost threats or other risk behaviors that are predetermined by the client, he added.
CNBC didn’t receive a response from Walmart, T-Mobile, Chevron, Starbucks or Nestle regarding their use of Aware. A representative from AstraZeneca said the corporate uses the eDiscovery product but that it doesn’t use analytics to monitor sentiment or toxicity. Delta told CNBC that it uses Aware’s analytics and eDiscovery for monitoring trends and sentiment as a way to gather feedback from employees and other stakeholders, and for legal records retention in its social media platform.
It doesn’t take a dystopian novel enthusiast to see where it could all go very incorrect.
![Generative AI is coming to wealth management in a very big way, says Ritholtz's Josh Brown](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107365191-17062918051706291803-33066365856-1080pnbcnews.jpg?v=1706291805&w=750&h=422&vtcrop=y)
Jutta Williams, co-founder of AI accountability nonprofit Humane Intelligence, said AI adds a latest and potentially problematic wrinkle to so-called insider risk programs, which have existed for years to evaluate things like corporate espionage, especially inside email communications.
Speaking broadly about employee surveillance AI slightly than Aware’s technology specifically, Williams told CNBC: “Numerous this becomes thought crime.” She added, “That is treating people like inventory in a way I’ve not seen.”
Employee surveillance AI is a rapidly expanding but area of interest piece of a bigger AI market that is exploded prior to now 12 months, following the launch of OpenAI’s ChatGPT chatbot in late 2022. Generative AI quickly became the buzzy phrase for corporate earnings calls, and a few type of the technology is automating tasks in nearly every industry, from financial services and biomedical research to logistics, online travel and utilities.
Aware’s revenue has jumped 150% per 12 months on average over the past five years, Schumann told CNBC, and its typical customer has about 30,000 employees. Top competitors include Qualtrics, Relativity, Proofpoint, Smarsh and Netskope.
By industry standards, Aware is staying quite lean. The corporate last raised money in 2021, when it pulled in $60 million in a round led by Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Compare that with large language model, or LLM, corporations equivalent to OpenAI and Anthropic, which have raised billions of dollars each, largely from strategic partners.
‘Tracking real-time toxicity’
Schumann began the corporate in 2017 after spending almost eight years working on enterprise collaboration at insurance company Nationwide.
Before that, he was an entrepreneur. And Aware is not the primary company he’s began that is elicited thoughts of Orwell.
In 2005, Schumann founded an organization called BigBrotherLite.com. According to his LinkedIn profile, the business developed software that “enhanced the digital and mobile viewing experience” of the CBS reality series “Big Brother.” In Orwell’s classic novel “1984,” Big Brother was the leader of a totalitarian state during which residents were under perpetual surveillance.
“I built a straightforward player focused on a cleaner and easier consumer experience for people to watch the TV show on their computer,” Schumann said in an email.
At Aware, he’s doing something very different.
Every 12 months, the corporate puts out a report aggregating insights from the billions — in 2023, the number was 6.5 billion — of messages sent across large corporations, tabulating perceived risk aspects and workplace sentiment scores. Schumann refers to the trillions of messages sent across workplace communication platforms every 12 months as “the fastest-growing unstructured data set on the planet.”
When including other sorts of content being shared, equivalent to images and videos, Aware’s analytics AI analyzes greater than 100 million pieces of content day by day. In so doing, the technology creates an organization social graph, taking a look at which teams internally talk to one another greater than others.
“It is often tracking real-time employee sentiment, and it is usually tracking real-time toxicity,” Schumann said of the analytics tool. “Should you were a bank using Aware and the sentiment of the workforce spiked within the last 20 minutes, it’s because they’re talking about something positively, collectively. The technology would have the opportunity to tell them whatever it was.”
Aware confirmed to CNBC that it uses data from its enterprise clients to train its machine-learning models. The corporate’s data repository incorporates about 6.5 billion messages, representing about 20 billion individual interactions across greater than 3 million unique employees, the corporate said.
When a latest client signs up for the analytics tool, it takes Aware’s AI models about two weeks to train on employee messages and get to know the patterns of emotion and sentiment throughout the company so it will possibly see what’s normal versus abnormal, Schumann said.
“It won’t have names of individuals, to protect the privacy,” Schumann said. Slightly, he said, clients will see that “perhaps the workforce over the age of 40 on this a part of the USA is seeing the changes to [a] policy very negatively due to the associated fee, but everybody else outside of that age group and site sees it positively since it impacts them another way.”
![FTC scrutinizes megacap's AI deals](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107364641-17062107841706210781-33053162930-1080pnbcnews.jpg?v=1706210784&w=750&h=422&vtcrop=y)
But Aware’s eDiscovery tool operates in a different way. An organization can arrange role-based access to employee names depending on the “extreme risk” category of the corporate’s selection, which instructs Aware’s technology to pull a person’s name, in certain cases, for human resources or one other company representative.
“A few of the common ones are extreme violence, extreme bullying, harassment, but it surely does vary by industry,” Schumann said, adding that in financial services, suspected insider trading could be tracked.
As an example, a client can specify a “violent threats” policy, or every other category, using Aware’s technology, Schumann said, and have the AI models monitor for violations in Slack, Microsoft Teams and Workplace by Meta. The client could also couple that with rule-based flags for certain phrases, statements and more. If the AI found something that violated an organization’s specified policies, it could provide the employee’s name to the client’s designated representative.
This kind of practice has been used for years inside email communications. What’s latest is the usage of AI and its application across workplace messaging platforms equivalent to Slack and Teams.
Amba Kak, executive director of the AI Now Institute at Latest York University, worries about using AI to help determine what’s considered dangerous behavior.
“It leads to a chilling effect on what people are saying within the workplace,” said Kak, adding that the Federal Trade Commission, Justice Department and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have all expressed concerns on the matter, though she wasn’t speaking specifically about Aware’s technology. “These are as much employee rights issues as they are privacy issues.”
Schumann said that though Aware’s eDiscovery tool allows security or HR investigations teams to use AI to search through massive amounts of information, a “similar but basic capability already exists today” in Slack, Teams and other platforms.
“A key distinction here is that Aware and its AI models are not making decisions,” Schumann said. “Our AI simply makes it easier to comb through this latest data set to discover potential risks or policy violations.”
Privacy concerns
Even when data is aggregated or anonymized, research suggests, it is a flawed concept. A landmark study on data privacy using 1990 U.S. Census data showed that 87% of Americans might be identified solely by using ZIP code, birth date and gender. Aware clients using its analytics tool have the ability to add metadata to message tracking, equivalent to employee age, location, division, tenure or job function.
“What they’re saying is counting on a really outdated and, I might say, entirely debunked notion at this point that anonymization or aggregation is sort of a magic bullet through the privacy concern,” Kak said.
Moreover, the form of AI model Aware uses could be effective at generating inferences from aggregate data, making accurate guesses, as an illustration, about personal identifiers based on language, context, slang terms and more, according to recent research.
“No company is basically ready to make any sweeping assurances in regards to the privacy and security of LLMs and these sorts of systems,” Kak said. “There isn’t a one who can inform you with a straight face that these challenges are solved.”
And what about employee recourse? If an interaction is flagged and a employee is disciplined or fired, it’s difficult for them to offer a defense if they don’t seem to be privy to all of the information involved, Williams said.
“How do you face your accuser after we know that AI explainability remains to be immature?” Williams said.
Schumann said in response: “None of our AI models make decisions or recommendations regarding employee discipline.”
“When the model flags an interaction,” Schumann said, “it provides full context around what happened and what policy it triggered, giving investigation teams the data they need to determine next steps consistent with company policies and the law.”
WATCH: AI is ‘really at play here’ with the recent tech layoffs
![AI is 'really at play here' with the recent tech layoffs, says Jason Greer](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107364335-17061866781706186675-33048845410-1080pnbcnews.jpg?v=1706186678&w=750&h=422&vtcrop=y)