![EU regulators will 'fully and completely' follow the write-down hierarchy if another bank fails](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107217527-1680159375076-1680159060-28797809449-hd.jpg?v=1680160184&w=750&h=422&vtcrop=y)
BRUSSELS – European regulators distanced themselves from Swiss decision to erase $17 billion Credit Suissebonds following the bank bailout, saying they might first write off shareholder investments.
Dominique Laboureix, president of the EU’s Single Resolution Board, sent a transparent message to investors in an exclusive interview with CNBC.
related investment news
![Here's where $10,000 can be invested right now, according to the pros](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107214064-1679582529377-gettyimages-1475548620-dscf8398_m1u1bjgr.jpeg?v=1680048852)
“IN [a banking] here, in a European context, we’d follow the hierarchy and we desired to make that very clear to investors to avoid misunderstandings: we’ve no selection but to respect that hierarchy,” Laboureix said on Wednesday.
It comes after Swiss regulator FINMA announced earlier this month that Credit Suisse’s additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds, widely thought to be relatively dangerous investments, might be written off to zero, while stock investors will receive greater than $3 billion as a part of the takeover of the bank by UBSindignant bondholders.
In a joint statement with ECB Banking Supervision and the European Banking Authority, the Single Resolution Board stated on March 20 that “common capital instruments are the primary to soak up losses and only after they’re fully used will additional Tier 1 should be written off “.
The usual hierarchy or framework sees equity investments as secondary to bonds within the event of a bank bailout.
The Swiss decision prompted some Credit Suisse AT1 bondholders to contemplate legal motion and created uncertainty amongst bondholders world wide.
The second largest Swiss bank Credit Suisse is visible next to the Swiss flag in the middle of Geneva.
Fabrice Coffrini | AFP | Getty Images
“Because the resolution authority chargeable for the resolution framework of the Banking Union, I can say that I’ll fully and completely comply with the legal framework. So within the event of resolution, when adopting a resolution plan, I’ll follow this hierarchy, starting with Equity absorption, then AT1, then Tier 2, then the remainder,” Laboureix said.
Switzerland will not be a part of the European Union and subsequently not subject to regional banking regulations.
The Single Resolution Board became operational in 2015 within the wake of the worldwide financial and sovereign debt crisis. Its fundamental function is to be sure that the true economy is affected as little as possible within the event of a bank failure within the euro area.
Stronger at Silicon Valley Bank
The recent banking turmoil began in america with the collapse of Silvergate Capital, a cryptocurrency-focused bank. Soon after, regulators shut down Silicon Valley Bank after which Signature Bank as a consequence of a major outflow of deposits to forestall the spread of the virus across the sector.
Since that point Bank of the First Republic it received support from other banks, and in Switzerland authorities asked UBS to bail out Credit Suisse. Deutsche Bank shares fell late last week, leading some to query whether the German bank might be next, although analysts insisted its financial position looked strong.
For regulators within the Eurozone, the Silicon Valley Bank collapse and maybe subsequent events might have been avoided had stricter banking regulations been in place.
“A bank like this is able to be subject to strict rules,” Laboureix said. “I’m not judging … but I understand that these medium-sized banks, the so-called medium-sized banks within the US, were actually large banks in comparison with ours within the banking union.”
![Rolling back banking regulation was a](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107217533-16801601091680160104-28797963536-1080pnbcnews.jpg?v=1680160906&w=750&h=422&vtcrop=y)
European lawmakers previously told CNBC that US regulators made mistakes in stopping the collapse of SVB and others.
Considered one of the important thing differences between the US and Europe is that the previous has a more relaxed set of capital rules for smaller banks.
For instance, Basel III – a set of reforms that strengthen supervision and risk management in banks and has been developed since 2008 – applies to most European banks. But US lenders with a balance sheet of lower than $250 billion do not have to comply.
Despite the recent turmoil, European regulators say the sector is powerful and resilient, particularly as a consequence of the extent of controls put in place because the global financial crisis.
“In the event you have a look at the events of the past – I mean Covid, Archegoes, Greensill, the Gilt crisis within the UK last September, etc. good solvency and excellent liquidity and excellent profitability,” Laboureix said.
“I actually consider that yes, our banking system is resilient. That doesn’t suggest we do not have to be vigilant.”
— Elliot Smith of CNBC contributed to this report