![Dialogue 'absolutely essential' as competition from major powers intensifies, New Zealand's defense minister says](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107249766-16856695441685669541-29710581954-1080pnbcnews.jpg?v=1685672613&w=750&h=422&vtcrop=y)
Will they or won’t they?
Before this weekend Shangri-La Dialogue There was much speculation surrounding a possible meeting between US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and his Chinese counterpart Li Shangfu.
Each are among the many world’s defense leaders who will gather within the city-state to debate Asia’s most pressing security challenges.
Late Monday, China confirmed the presence of its Minister of Defence on the forum around the identical time The Pentagon said China rejected a U.S. request for a gathering between the 2 defense chiefs.
Relations between Beijing and Washington hit a recent low when Nancy Pelosi, then Speaker of the US House of Representatives, visited Taiwan in August, despite China’s warnings to the US to honor its commitment to the “One China” principle.
Earlier this yr, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken postponed his trip to Beijing after Washington shot down what it described as a possible statement balloon off the coast of South Carolina. China has asserted that the balloon was not intended for spying.
“I’m not surprised that the meeting didn’t occur given the present tense relationship,” said Drew Thompson, a former U.S. defense official who’s now a senior visiting research fellow on the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore.
“Any meeting between Austin and Li would reassure other countries within the region, but I do not think it’ll change the safety dynamic or the potential for instability.”
Regional concerns were recently highlighted by the Pentagon, which said a Chinese fighter jet made an “unnecessarily aggressive maneuver” against a US reconnaissance aircraft within the South China Sea late last week.
Under President Xi Jinping’s leadership, China has turn into more hawkish on the world stage, especially in its historic claims to Taiwan and the South China Sea. The latter is a strategic waterway wealthy in resources equivalent to oil and gas.
This has been a hotspot within the Asia-Pacific region for a minimum of the last decade as China has turn into more assertive and its growing economic importance bolsters its global influence. Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam even have competing claims to parts of the waterway, a vital trade route.
“We faced a security dilemma within the region,” said Chin-Hao Huang, writer of “Power and Restraint in China’s Rise” and professor of political science at Yale-NUS College in Singapore.
![US not too hard on China during top CEOs visit, says China expert Dennis Unkovic](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107248175-16854703571685470353-29678678825-1080pnbcnews.jpg?v=1685473094&w=750&h=422&vtcrop=y)
“Some countries may attempt to bolster their very own defense capabilities to discourage all types of threats from China, but China will interpret this defense build-up as an affront, and so they, in turn, will double and speed up military advances,” he added.
“This type of action-reaction dynamic actually causes a variety of concern and really increases tensions, compounded by a scarcity of trust and dialogue,” Huang added.
China is now set to extend defense spending this yr by 7.2% to 1.56 trillion Chinese yuan ($220 billion) – the fastest rate of annual growth in 4 years.
“China adheres to a national defense policy based on the principle of self-defense. We’re committed to maintaining peace and security within the region and internationally, and we don’t pose a challenge to other countries,” the country’s foreign ministry said in a Friday response statement. to a request for comment on this story, as translated by CNBC.
What’s on the agenda?
Organized by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, the Shangri-La Dialogue, now in its twentieth yr, offers nations a chance to have interaction in dialogue. The forum is frequently characterised by a flurry of bilateral and multilateral meetings on the sidelines of the primary agenda.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will deliver a keynote address on Friday.
“What you are seeing is the emergence of a regional security architecture,” said Thompson of the LKY school. “The region really does share a standard interest in regional security and stability.”
That is evidenced by quite a lot of bilateral and multilateral initiatives which have emerged over the past few years, including a recent strategic agreement between Vietnam and the Philippines, improved Japan-South Korea relations, and the resumption of the quadrilateral security dialogue between Australia, Japan, India and the US
“China has the power to take part in this in the event that they want to,” Thompson added. “Nonetheless, Beijing would must effectively change its approach and consider the impact of coercive policies on its neighbors, whether it’s military pressure on Taiwan, economic coercion on Korea and Japan, or just not recognizing international law.”
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a written statement: “We now have not used economic coercion all along. Quite the opposite, another countries used economic coercion against China. We would like to reiterate that Taiwan is a component of China, we consider the Taiwan issue as China’s internal affairs.”
Meetings in Singapore
![China and US should work together to remove tensions, says Chinese tech firm](https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/image/107244479-16847378311684737827-29561102430-1080pnbcnews.jpg?v=1684738421&w=750&h=422&vtcrop=y)
Upcoming opportunities include the G20 leaders’ meeting in Latest Delhi in September and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation leaders’ meeting in San Francisco in November.
Until then, the specter of those feuding superpowers will likely forged a shadow over all other nations.
“The USA will try to extend its role and influence by relying increasingly more on its military superiority and capabilities because it fears losing its superpower status,” said Huang of Yale-NUS.
“But from Asia, priorities could also be slightly different,” he added. “As a substitute of engaging in a general arms race, countries within the region are reacting to and coping with China pragmatically because they’re in such close geographical proximity and sometimes cannot afford hard rhetoric or a containment-like approach that emphasizes military capability. “
He said that crucial thing for the steadiness of the region is to make sure constant access to trade and economic development.
“So there’s some discrepancy with the US foreign policy approach, which tends to overemphasize military deterrence or security because the default response to China’s rise,” Huang added.
— Evelyn Cheng of CNBC contributed to this text.